Legal Opinion

McLeod v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (In Re McLeod)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 10, 2000No. 19-42988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WALTER SHAPERO, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co.’s motion for summary judgment as to Donald McLeod’s (“Debtor”) complaint, which alleges that Defendant violated the automatic stay and the permanent injunction. Debtor’s complaint stems from Defendant’s commencement of a state court action, post-discharge, to repossess goods in which it claims it holds a perfected purchase money security interest. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendant’s motion.

II.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Philip Berryman v. Dean Rieger, C. Kukla, Diane HolzheuerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Sheila R. Douglas v. E.G. Baldwin & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re CunninghamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API