Legal Opinion
Carrigan v. California State Legislature
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 28, 1959No. 16189PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STANLEY N. BARNES, Circuit Judge.
On May 22, 1958, Mrs. Grace Carri-gan, in propria persona, filed a complaint in the district court against the defendants named above in the caption.
This complaint was entitled:
“Complaint. An action in equity, because the Workmen’s Compensation and Insurance Division of the Labor Code of the State of California, maintained in effect by the State of California, is so inequitable and deficient as to constitute a fraud, maintained in the name of law, against the people of the State of California, in violation of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Food Fair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Premier-Pabst Sales Co. v. GrosscupSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kedra v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Carroll v. First National Bank of LincolnwoodCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Maxey v. QuintanaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Edwin F. Gordon, Cross-Appellee v. E. G. Green, Gustave T. Broberg, Jr., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Graczyk v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.