Legal Opinion
Kassem v. Blinken
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 27, 2021No. 1:21-cv-01400Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAIDAN KASSEM, et al., No. 1:21-cv-01400-DAD-HBK 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ EMERGENCY MOTION FOR 14 ANTONY J. BLINKEN, et al., RECONSIDERATION 15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 11) 16 17 18 This matter is before the court on defendants’ emergency motion for reconsideration of 19 this court’s September 23, 2021 order granting plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction. 20 (Doc. Nos. 10, 11.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency 21 posed by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Harvest v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.