Legal Opinion

Kraft v. Rooke

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1930No. Docket No. 87PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the stipulated amount of his services upon an alleged contract of employment which he claims was terminated without cause. The evidence discloses and the trial court found “That on December 24, 1924, defendant and plaintiff entered into a contract, whereby defendant employed plaintiff to work for defendant at defendant’s packing house in Lindsay, California, for a period of one year; said employment to commence on January 1st, 1925, and end on December 31, 1925, said defendant to pay plaintiff for his services the sum of $250.00 per month.” And that by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Diamond v. JacquithArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Chase v. HinkleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Standing v. MoroscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ravarino v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Allen v. MoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. McClure v. CeratiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Halsey v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API