Legal Opinion
Keegan v. Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Pension Plan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 26, 2003No. 02-3312UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff union members sued the defendant union pension funds (and the funds’ administrators) alleging a breach of fiduciary duty and seeking a declaratory judgment that the plaintiffs were entitled to pension credits they allegedly had accrued years earlier. The District Court, after ruling on dispositive motions and conducting a bench trial, entered judgment for the defendants. The plaintiffs appeal. We affirm. 1
I
The plaintiffs in this suit are John Keegan, Harry Instase, and Philip Garton. The defendants are the Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Pension Plan…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Metro Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Metric Constructors, Inc. v. National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Joan Eddy, of the Estate of James Peter Eddy v. Colonial Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Keegan v. Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Pension FundDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Keegan v. Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Pension FundDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- DOWNS FORD, INC. v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Picone v. Shire U.S. Inc. (Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Class Action)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020