Legal Opinion

FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint)

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 9, 2020No. 1:16-cv-12653Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * * * * In re INTUNIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION Civil Action Nos.1:16-cv-12653-ADB * (Both Direct and Indirect Cases) 1:16-cv-12396-ADB * * * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDERON MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE BURROUGHS, D.J. This “pay-for-delay” or “reverse settlement” case arises from an alleged anticompetitive agreement made between the brand and generic manufacturers of Intuniv, an ADHD medication. Defendants Shire LLC and Shire U.S., Inc. (collectively, “Shire”) manufacture Intuniv, which is the brand-name for extended release guanfacine hydrochloride.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API