Legal Opinion
Keegan v. Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Pension Fund
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 23, 2002No. 00-CV-4246PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
In this action John Keegan (“Keegan”), Harry Instase (“Instase”), and Philip Gar-ton (“Garton”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) have brought suit against Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Pension Fund (“420 Pension Fund” or “Local 420 Fund”), William T. Sweeney (“Sweeney”), the former administrator of that fund, and United Association Local Union No. 322 Pension Fund (“322 Pension Fund” or “Local 322 Fund”). Plaintiffs instituted this action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and claim that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefit "Erisa" Litigation. Gerald E. Pickering, Fred Tonnies, William Leonhardt, Evelyn Schmidt, Dudley Keyes, David Kahl, Paul Wright, Robert Wilt, Clay Bernichon, Edward Valle, Robert B. Welsh, Solveig Tschann, Bernard J. Jansen, Donald I. Klippenstein, Frederick W. Hoppe, Ludson F. Worsham, Edwin Marjala and Warren Hall, Individually and on Behalf of All Members of the Sperry Class Previously Certified by the Court Whose Claims Have Not Been SettledCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- George W. Henglein v. Colt Industries Operating CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Compass Technology, Inc. v. Tseng Laboratories, Inc., Wang Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Richard M. McQuestion v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., Louis A. Hart v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keegan v. Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Norris v. MazzolaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017