Peaples Finance & Thift Co. v. Matthews Fruit Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
NORTON, J., pro tem.
This is an action to recover the amount of a cheek made by the appellant corporation and delivered to the defendant Oakes, who transferred it the same day to the respondent. The defendants other than Oakes pleaded fraud and want of consideration as a defense to the action and that the respondent took with notice of his equities. Oakes, the assignee of the check, was owing respondent the sum of $805.75, which was evidenced by two promissory notes and secured by a chattel mortgage of Oakes to one Caplan and assigned to respondent. The check was for $1500 and represented…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ph&338nix Insurance Company v. . ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Dresser v. Missouri & Iowa Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Merchs. Nat'l Bank of Santa Monica v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Pacific Acceptance Corp. v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fair Loans, Inc. v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Robb v. CardozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Mars, Inc. v. ChubriloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Bramante v. KrugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Howland v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932