Legal Opinion

Schuyler v. Metropolitan Transit Commission

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 17, 1985No. CX-85-669PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant Sidney Schuyler alleges that he was wrongfully discharged by respondent Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) for seeking workers’ compensation benefits. MTC moved for dismissal or, in the alternative, summary judgment. One of MTC’s arguments before the trial court was that Schuyler’s complaint should be dismissed because he failed to exhaust the grievance procedures under the collective bargaining agreement before bringing this suit. The trial court granted summary judgment to MTC on different grounds, holding that Schuyler’s claim for breach of his employment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Puchert v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brinkman v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Navarre v. South Washington County SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Jarvis v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Taubman v. Prospect Drilling & Sawing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API