Legal Opinion

Jarvis v. Levine

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 2, 1987No. C2-86-1633PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This case involves the qualified right of a state hospital patient, involuntarily committed as mentally ill and dangerous, to refuse neuroleptic medication in nonemergency circumstances and the correlative duties of state officials prior to forced administration of such medication. Appellant Homer Jarvis commenced this action for damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and for declaratory and injunctive relief on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. 1 Four claims are asserted in the complaint: (1) that the Minnesota Department of Human Service (DHS) employees…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Mills v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Rivers v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Matter of KolodrubetzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Matter of RiceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Jarvis v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API