Legal Opinion

George v. Tanner

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1985No. 13434Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

That I do not join an opinion whereby Justices Donaldson and Bakes join Justice Huntley in withdrawing the opinion for the *44Court which was released almost 30 months ago should not come as any great surprise. The opinion of September 30, 1982, was premised entirely on the unchallenged finding of the trial court that the Georges and the Tanners, in cancelling the debt created by the theater contract as consideration for the Georges’ acquiring $50,000 of “principal” payments due on the Evans contract with the Tanners retaining $20,000 of “down” payments, respectively acquired five-sevenths and…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Arkansas Territorial Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Hoffman v. SV Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Boesiger v. FreerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API