Legal Opinion

Dwight v. Waldron

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1917No. 13982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Grays Harbor county, Sheeks, J., entered March 21,1916, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action for equitable relief.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— This is an action brought by the appellant, Dwight, against the respondents Waldron to set aside a tax deed to certain real property situate in the city of Hoquiam, and to quiet the title of the respondents to certain undivided interests in the property. A demurrer to the complaint was interposed and sustained, after which the appel*157lant elected to stand thereon. From a judgment of dismissal thereafter entered, this appeal is prosecuted. The ultimate question therefore is, Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action?

The facts stated in the complaint are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Starkweather v. JennerSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Wilson v. LinderIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Cedar Canyon Consolidated Mining Co. v. YarwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Stone v. MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clallam County v. FolkWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Buchanan v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In Re Foreclosure of LiensWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. United States v. Ferry CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API