Legal Opinion

Lambert Snyder Vibrator Co. v. Marvel Vibrator Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided April 29, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 773,234, for a vibratile apparatus, granted to Lambert Snyder October 25, 1904. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The patent is of very recent date, and has not heretofore been adjudicated. That circumstance, however, is not sufficient ground for refusing preliminary 'injunction, unless there is some substantial question as to validity. Fuller v. Gilmore (C. C.) 121 Fed. 129. The evidence fails to disclose any anticipating paterit, or anything in the prior art which would at all qualify the language of the first claim. The patents for toys which Have been put in proof are devised to secure vibrations in a flexible movable arm, not in the rigid rod on which such arm moves. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fuller v. GilmoreU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boyce v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  2. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Worth Featherweight Pen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  3. Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. JumperDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1928
  4. Hutto Engineering Co. v. Grinder Sales Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927
  5. Palmer v. Wilcox Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API