Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Bowker

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 8, 1919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action of Tort for trespass against real estate. Plea, the general issue.' Trial by Hartford Municipal Court, A. G. WML ■ ham, Judge. Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is an action of tort brought to the Hartford municipal court for the wilful and malicious injury of premises owned by the plaintiff and occupied by the defendant as a tenant. The plaintiff had judgment on the facts found by the court, and the defendant brings up exceptions.

The cause was submitted without argument. Upon inspection of the papers, it is discovered that the copies furnished the Court do not conform in several particulars to our rule respecting the preparation of the ease. See Buie 5 of Supreme Court. None of the papers are printed and leave was not asked to substitute…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  2. Connecticut & Passumpsic Rivers Rail Road v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
  3. Tracy v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  4. Landon v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  5. Fraser v. NerneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of EverettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  2. Plant v. AhlbergSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. Colvin v. GraySupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  4. State v. DolleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  5. Monti v. ThoringtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API