Legal Opinion

Connecticut & Passumpsic Rivers Rail Road v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 15, 1852PublishedCited by 24 opinions

This was art action of Assumpsit, for the recovery of assessments on two shares of the capital stock of said company, subscribed by the defendant. Plea, non-assumpsit and trial by jury.

Read the full summary

This was art action of Assumpsit, for the recovery of assessments on two shares of the capital stock of said company, subscribed by the defendant. Plea, non-assumpsit and trial by jury. On the trial, the plaintiff read in evidence, the act of incorporation passed in 1835, and also acts of 1843 and 1845, modifying said act, as set forth in the declaration ; and proved that the commissioners named in said acts, duly opened books for subscriptions to the capital stock of’ said company, the terms and conditions of which were as follows: “ Connecticut and Passumpsic Rivers Rail Road Company.”…

1Opinion of the Court

*472The opinion of the court was delivered by

Isham, J.

Several questions are .presented in this case, arising first on the motion to dismiss, and secondly, on exceptions allowed on the trial of the case before the jury. The exceptions, taken on the plea in abatement, having been withdrawn, and no objections having been urged to the declaration on the motion in arrest, we are relieved from the investigation of any questions arising thereon..The motion to dismiss was properly overruled. The writ on its face appeal's to have been signed by a proper oificer, and a recognizance of bail duly taken. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Andover & Medford Turnpike Corp. v. GouldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  2. Blodgett v. MorrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
  3. Franklin Glass Co. v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  4. New Bedford & Bridgewater Turnpike Corp. v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
  5. Essex Bridge Co. v. TuttleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1830

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. New Haven Horse Nail Co. v. Linden Spring Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Callanan v. JuddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Gibbons v. Mobile & Great Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  5. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R. v. McKees Rocks BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API