Legal Opinion

State v. Dolley

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 1, 1964No. 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal has come to this Court after a verdict and judgment of guilty of a motor vehicle violation. The respondent has furnished no transcript of the proceedings below, nor has he submitted copies of the printed case setting forth extracts of the record essential to present the question he has briefed, as required by 12 V.S.A. §2390 and Supreme Court Rule 7. See Stevens v. Bowker, 93 Vt. 480, 481, 108 Atl. 347. The respondent seeks to supply these requirements by presenting an agreed statement of facts. The method adopted fails to comply with 12 V.S.A. §2390 and is not authorized by court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Appliance Acceptance Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  2. Norway v. PetitSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  3. Stevens v. BowkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  4. State v. AsheySupreme Court of Vermont · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Richard H. JoyceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  2. D'ARCHANGELO v. LoyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  3. Mitchell v. AmadonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  4. Hunn v. KoerberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  5. Joe Golden v. Gwyn WorthingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API