Polhemus v. Prudential Realty Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to tire Supreme Court. This was an action ex contractu begun in the Supreme Court by the defendant in error, Peter G-. Polhemus, against the plaintiff in error, Bichard 3. Deutz, impleaded with the Prudential Bealty Corporation. The declaration was in the form prescribed by the Practice act of 1903 (Pamph.
Read the full summary
On error to tire Supreme Court. This was an action ex contractu begun in the Supreme Court by the defendant in error, Peter G-. Polhemus, against the plaintiff in error, Bichard 3. Deutz, impleaded with the Prudential Bealty Corporation. The declaration was in the form prescribed by the Practice act of 1903 (Pamph. L., p. 542, § 30), and the notice annexed to the declaration contained a copy of the promissory note and the endorsements thereof, as follows: “$2,000. Few Brunswick, F. J., Mar. 28th, 1904. “Three months after date, we promise to pay to the order of Prudential Bealty Corporation…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court (the foregoing statement having been made) was delivered by
Ghees', J.
By way of introduction, it should be remarked that the counsel of the defendant in error objects to both of the assignments; that they lack definiteness in pointing out the grounds of error. It may be that if the arguments of the plaintiff in error seemed to us of compelling force, we would be obliged to inquire whether he had, as a matter of practice, secured a firm foundation whereon his arguments might rest, *575"but as our consideration of the case leads us to deny any such force to the arguments,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kelly v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- McDonald v. MagruderSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- State v. HardeleinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- Middleton v. GriffithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
- Atwater v. . FarthingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nester v. O'DonnellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Offer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Meyer Koulish Co. v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Camden Co. Welfare Bd. v. Federal Dep. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- Kimberley & Carpenter, Inc. v. National Liberty InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.