Middleton v. Griffith
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lippincott, J.
This is an action on a promissory note given by the defendant below,, who is here the plaintiff ins *443error, to the plaintiff below, the defendant in error in this court, for the sum of $375, dated April 22d, 1889, payable in three months from the date. The note was first endorsed by Richard Griffith, the plaintiff; then by “ The Provident Life and Trust Company of Philadelphia, May 9th, 1889 ;” then “ for collection, remittance to Central National Bank, Philadelphia, Pa., Theo. Kitchen, cashier.” At the time of trial the last two…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dugan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Muller v. . PondirNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Bayliss v. . CockcroftNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Humphreyville v. Culver, Page, Hoyne & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Vrooman v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Polhemus v. Prudential Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- R. M. Owen & Co. v. Storms & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Vermont Evaporator Co. v. TaftSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- Meserve v. TraversoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. GohlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.