Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Certainteed Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 14, 1996No. Civ. A. No. 94-2310-GTVPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.
The court has under consideration a Motion To Compel CertainTeed Corporation (CertainTeed) to Disclose The Addresses And Telephone Numbers Of Individuals Identified Pursuant To Rule 26 and For Sanctions (doc. 113) and a Motion For Leave To Take Additional Depositions of Certain-Teed Employees and For Sanctions (doc. 114), both filed by plaintiff Barney Dixon. Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 governs motions to compel. Fed.R.Civ.P. 30 governs motions for leave to take additional depositions. Defendant Cer-tainTeed opposes the motions.
Plaintiff seeks…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chancellor v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1988
- Aiken v. Business and Industry Health Group, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
3Cited by28 opinions
- St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Poole v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Sender v. MannDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Barrow v. Greenville Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.