Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided April 3, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01775Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHARON HUGHES CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 23-1775 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET AL. SECTION “R” (4) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is the opposed1 motion to strike witnesses, or alternatively, motion in limine to exclude the testimony of Corey Hughes, Amy Hughes, and Taylor Hughes, of defendants United Financial Casualty Company (“United Financial”) and Briana Gordon.2 For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion to strike. I. BACKGROUND This case arises from injuries allegedly suffered by plaintiff Sharon Hughes while…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Primrose Operating Co. v. National American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Texas A&M Research Foundation v. Magna Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- CQ, Inc. v. TXU Mining Co., L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Reed v. Iowa Marine and Repair Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Fausto v. Credigy Services Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.