Legal Opinion
Procter & Gamble Co. v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 12, 2009No. 08-cv-251-bbcPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
This is a civil action for infringement of a patent for tooth whitening strips. Plaintiff Procter & Gamble Company is the owner of U.S. Patents Nos. 6,551,579 (“the '579 patent”) and 6,949,240 (“the '240 patent”) that cover plaintiffs products such as Crest Whitestrips® Premium, Crest Whitestrips® Premium Plus, Crest® Healthy Radiance, Crest Whitestrips® Renewal and Crest Whitestrips® Supreme. On May 1, 2008, plaintiff filed a complaint against Johnson & Johnson and defendant McNeil, alleging that their Listerine Whitening Quick Dissolving…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Plumley v. MockettDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Moore v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- HTC Corp. v. IPCom GMBH & Co., KGDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012