Legal Opinion
HTC Corp. v. IPCom GMBH & Co., KG
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 28, 2012No. Civil Action No. 08-1897(RMC)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION REGARDING IPCOM’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION AND SUPPLEMENTATION OF RECORD REGARDING THE 216 PATENT
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
By Opinion and Order issued March 16, 2012, this Court held that products sold by HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. do not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,390,216, owned by IPCom GMBH & Co., KG. IP-Com now moves for partial reconsideration and seeks to supplement the record, to show infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and to limit the scope of the ruling in HTC’s favor. Neither of these goals provides a basis for reconsideration.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Lexion Medical, LLC v. Northgate Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.