Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Spotz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 2014PublishedCited by 728 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice STEVENS.

The Commonwealth appeals from the order of the Superior Court, which reversed the order denying Appellee’s petition pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546, vacated his judgment of sentence, and remanded for a new trial. We reverse the order of the Superior Court, and remand to that court for consideration of Appellee’s PCRA issues that remain in abeyance.

I. Background

The facts underlying Appellee’s conviction and judgment of sentence are discussed more fully in this Court’s prior decision on discretionary review of Appellee’s direct…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by728 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. Mason, L., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. CharlestonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. Spotz, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. FreelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

723 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API