Legal Opinion
AMHS Insurance v. Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 30, 2001No. Nos. 99-15703, 99-15704PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SNEED; Dissent by Judge GRABER
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Appellant AmHS Insurance Company, Risk Retention Group (“RRG”) and Appel-lee Mutual Insurance Company of Arizona (“MICA”) provided professional liability insurance to Dr. Wesley Romberger (“Dr. Romberger”). ' Following a jury trial, Dr. Romberger was found negligent in his care and treatment of Christina Beery. RRG defended Dr. Romberger and satisfied the $7,897,543.18 judgment against him. The parties dispute how much MICA should contribute to the payment of this judgment.
RRG appeals the district court’s determination that…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie Kirkland, Debtors. Security Pacific National Bank v. Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BogartArizona Supreme Court · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Amhs Insurance Company, Risk Retention Group, a Foreign Corporation v. Mutual Insurance Company of Arizona, an Arizona Corporation, Amhs Insurance Company, Risk Retention Group, a Foreign Corporation v. Mutual Insurance Company of Opinion Arizona, an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Phillips v. UAW InternationalDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016