United States v. Ten Cartons, More or Less, of an Article ... Ener-B Vitamin B-12, Etc., United States of America v. Nature's Bounty, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Defendant-appellant Nature’s Bounty, Inc. ’ (“Nature’s Bounty”) appeals from a judgment entered April 14, 1995 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Arthur D. Spatt, Judge, that permanently enjoined Nature’s Bounty from introducing into interstate commerce Ener-B Nasal Gel (“Ener-B”), a vitamin B-12 supplement in gel form designed to be applied to the inside of the nose and absorbed into the bloodstream through the nasal mucosal membranes, or any other nasally administered nutrient unless and until authorized by a new drug application that has been reviewed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- American Health Products Co., Inc. v. HayesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- United States v. Ten Cartons, Ener-B Nasal GelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pdk Labs, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Mitchell K. Friedlander, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Universal Management Services, Inc., Corporation Natural Choice, Inc. Corporation, Doing Business as Natural Choice Products, Inc. Paul M. Monea, Individual Paul A. MoneaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Nve Inc. v. Department Of Health And Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Coyne Beahm, Inc. v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
- United States v. Universal Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.