Legal Opinion

Village of Oakwood v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1986No. 50999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, P.J.

The plaintiff village sought to enjoin the defendant automobile service station from selling “off the shelf” beverages and snack foods. The trial court granted that injunction on the ground that the village zoning code prohibits such activity at a service station in that zoning district. The service station appeals, arguing that the court incorrectly interpreted and applied the zoning laws. We agree, so we reverse that decision and remand the case for a determination of other zoning issues which the trial court did not reach.

I

The village’s complaint alleges that the service station is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977
  3. North Coast Cookies, Inc. v. Sweet Temptations, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Saunders v. Clark County Zoning DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Consolidated Management, Inc. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lakota Local School District Board of Education v. BricknerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Crestmont Cleveland Partnership v. Ohio Department of HealthOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. BP Oil Co. v. City of Dayton Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Penewit v. Spring Valley Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Ross v. Maumee City SchoolsOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API