Legal Opinion
Ass'n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. v. Food & Drug Admin.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 4, 2008No. Civil Action 07-0668 (JDB)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
In August 2006, the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approved Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (“Barr”) supplemental new drug application (“SNDA”) for Plan B, an emergency contraceptive drug currently marketed by Duramed Research, Inc. (“Duramed”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Barr. The approval of the SNDA allowed Plan B to be marketed without a prescription to consumers age 18 and over and retained the prescription requirement for consumers under the age of 18. Plaintiffs Association of American Physicians & Surgeons, Inc.…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- In Re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act ListingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Federal Forest Resource Coalition v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Holistic Candlers & Consumer Ass'n v. U.S. Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.