Turowski v. Johnson
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Reece, Judge.
This case returns to us following our reversal and remand in Turowski v. Johnson (1990), 68 Ohio App.3d 704, 589 N.E.2d 462 (Turowski I), directing the lower court to determine proper attorney fees to be awarded to Ohio Edison Company (“Ohio Edison”), pursuant to Ohio’s frivolous conduct statute, R.C. 2323.51. Ohio Edison now appeals the trial court’s determination of those fees.
Facts
A factual recitation is not necessary to properly analyze the case at bar. In Turowski I, this court found the lower court’s denial of Ohio Edison’s request for attorney fees to be assessed against…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Spalding v. SpaldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Ruwe v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ceol v. Zion Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bikkani v. Lee, 89312 (6-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Riley v. LangerOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Ohio Power Co. v. OgleOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Thomas v. MurryOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.