People v. Brazil
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment of guilty of kidnapping after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals. There is also a purported appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent), the essential facts are:
Shortly after 2 a. m., September 29, 1941, the prosecuting witness and a gentleman, now her husband, were seated in a parked car. Defendant flashed a light into the car, told them he was a police officer, and that they were under arrest. After questioning the prosecuting witness’s escort, defendant told him…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. ScalamieroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. CrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. GuiterezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. MagusinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.