Legal Opinion

People v. Brazil

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1942No. Crim. 3592PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment of guilty of kidnapping after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals. There is also a purported appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent), the essential facts are:

Shortly after 2 a. m., September 29, 1941, the prosecuting witness and a gentleman, now her husband, were seated in a parked car. Defendant flashed a light into the car, told them he was a police officer, and that they were under arrest. After questioning the prosecuting witness’s escort, defendant told him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ScalamieroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. CrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. People v. GuiterezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. People v. MagusinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API