Legal Opinion

People v. Scalamiero

California Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1904No. Crim. No. 1054PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Carroll Cook, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

Defendant, having been convicted of an assault with intent to commit rape upon a girl eleven years of age, moved for a new trial, which was denied, and from such order of denial he appeals.

He first insists that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. His counsel contents himself upon this- point by simply mentioning it, without undertaking to show in what respect or in what particular it is open to this objection.

We have, however, had occasion to refer to the evidence in examining various errors alleged by appellant to have been committed by the court in admitting and rejecting…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. DemetruliasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. In Re the Estate of De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. People v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API