Legal Opinion

People v. Magusin

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1932No. Docket No. 2144PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The crime described in section 146 of the California Vehicle Act (Stats. 1923, p. 564), and of which defendant was found guilty, is committed when any person drives a vehicle not his own, without the consent of the owner thereof and in the absence of the owner, and with intent to deprive the owner of his title or possession, whether with or without intent to steal the same. Any person who assists in, or is a party or accessory to or an accomplice in, any such stealing or unauthorized taking or driving, shall also be deemed-guilty of a felony.

It is contended by appellant that the evidence is…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. People v. InesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. People v. SteppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. BrazilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. People v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API