Legal Opinion

State v. King

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 16, 1977No. 1 CA-CR 2288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Chief Judge.

The appellant, Clarence King, seeks by this appeal to invalidate his conviction for forgery, A.R.S. § 13-421, which was based upon a plea of no contest.

Appellant was charged with attempting to pass a forged check to an employee of a retail food establishment. He initially entered a plea of not guilty, and appellee thereafter moved to add an allegation of prior felony conviction. The parties subsequently entered into a written plea agreement, by the terms of which appellant agreed to plead guilty to the forgery charge and appellee agreed to dismiss the allegation of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. McFallArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. OhtaArizona Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DraperArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. StillingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  3. State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. State v. SalinasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. State v. StillingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API