Legal Opinion

State v. McFall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1968No. 9062-PRPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Richard McFall was indicted, tried and convicted on five counts of obtaining narcotics by forgery of prescriptions, A.R.S. § 36-1017, as amended by Laws of 1963, Ch. 59. The Court of Appeals affirmed the *236convictions. Opinion 5 Ariz.App. 539, 428 P.2d 1013 vacated.

Defendant McFall urges that his statements made to the arresting officers and a written statement in his handwriting, a duplicate of the forged prescriptions, were involuntary. He testified that he was a narcotic user and when arrested had in his possession some narcotic “tablets and pills”. Then:

“Q Did you feel…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. PersingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. MosleyArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State of Iowa v. John Robert HoymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  5. State v. HensleyArizona Supreme Court · 1983

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API