State v. Norman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Presiding Judge.
The appellant Paul Norman was convicted upon his guilty plea of murder in the second degree. The victim of the murder was his wife. Appellant contends on appeal that he was not adequately advised of the nature of the offense to which he was pleading and that his plea was therefore not voluntarily and intelligently entered. Reliance is placed upon Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 96 S.Ct. 2253, 49 L.Ed.2d 108 (1976).
Appellant’s plea was offered pursuant to a written plea agreement. It was amended to provide for a plea of guilty rather than a plea of no contest.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. OhtaArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HagemannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. KoepplinMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. RogowskiArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987