Olympia Mining & Milling Co. v. Kerns
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Canfield, J., entered April 21, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for specific performance.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
In the year 1901, Clarence Cunningham entered into an agreement with the defendant, looking to the promotion and development of certain mining claims in Shoshone county, state of Idaho. Pursuant to the agreement, as it is contended by Cunningham, but after the contract had been abandoned by him, as the defendant insists, and after foreclosure proceedings, defendant acquired title to the property covered by the contract, and thereafter did assessment work and patented the claims. A part of the original agreement was to the effect that Cunningham would organize a corporation and take over the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Olmsted v. OlmstedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Kimball v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Great Western Railway Co. v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Cofrode v. GartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Silver Surprize, Inc. v. Sunshine Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
- Smith v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Olympia Mining & Milling Co. v. KernsIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Daniel v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Amey v. Colebrook Guaranty Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.