People v. Carroll
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a- new trial. C. W. Norton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny on an information jointly charging defendant and Walter Flavin and George Armstrong with its commission. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The prosecuting witness was one F. M. Katsura, a Japanese who resided at the city of Fresno.
The attorney-general makes the point that “the appellate record has not been properly perfected and the appeal should be dismissed.” The objections having been removed, it is not necessary to notice them.
Katsura testified that he came to Lathrop…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ChavesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. TurleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- People v. CuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. StoferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. TomskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.