Legal Opinion
Cutter v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 27, 1990No. 89-117PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
This appeal by the defendant from an order of summary judgment questions whether the Superior Court (Mayland H. Morse, Jr., Esq., Master; Dunn, J.) correctly found plaintiff, Jacqueline Cutter, entitled to underinsured motorist benefits under an insurance policy issued to her employer, Ransco, Inc., by the defendant, Maine Bonding & Casualty Company (MBCC). MBCC claims on *571appeal that the trial court erroneously concluded that Ms. Cutter was a person insured for the purposes of underinsured motorist coverage because she was a “member of the corporate ‘family’ engaged in employment by Ransco…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Insurance Co. of North America v. PerrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Kaysen v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Buckner v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. McKeeTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Jacobs v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- J & W FOODS CORP. v. State Farm Mut. Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Concrete Services, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.