Legal Opinion

Marshall v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1949No. Civ. 13968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment denying the peremptory writ of mandate set forth in the petition, the basis of which was that the husband of petitioner, William Marshall, who was a member of the Police Department of the city of Oakland, “died as a result of an injury and a disability incurred in the performance of his duties.”

Following the death of William Marshall petitioner filed an application, before respondents as trustees of the police relief and pension fund, that she be awarded a pension pursuant to section 96(1) (a) of the municipal charter. Petitioner’s application was denied by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buckley v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Naughton v. Retirement Board of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Brant v. Retirement Board of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Ellenberger v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Loveland v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. County of San Diego Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Cooper v. Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API