Legal Opinion

Gerrick & Gerrick Co. v. Llewellyn Iron Works

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1919No. 14900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Hall, J., entered December 18, 1917, upon findings in favor of the defendant, quashing service of process upon a foreign corporation, after a hearing before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent is a foreign corporation, whose home office is located at Los Angeles, California. In the year 1908, it qualified itself to do business in the state of "Washington by filing its articles of incorporation, paying the annual corporation license fees, fixing its principal place of business in the state at Seattle, and appointing one Parvin Wright as its statutory agent upon whom service of process could be made. Wright acted as its agent until the year 1913, when he abandoned the agency to enter into a separate business on his own account. No other statutory agent was thereafter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Forrest v. Pittsburgh Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  2. Green v. Equitable Mutual Life & Endowment Ass'n of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Atlantic & Pacific Fisheries Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Southwest Metals Co. v. SnedakerArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Stevens v. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Fauchier v. McNeil Const. Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1949
  5. DeBoard v. B. Perini & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API