Legal Opinion
Fauchier v. McNeil Const. Co.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 30, 1949No. 656PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ Complaint was filed August 26, 1947. Defendant McNeil Construction Co. moves to dismiss, or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement. *575The Motion includes several defenses and objections as authorized by Rule 12 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Rule 12 has abolished for federal courts the age-old distinction between general and special appearances. Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp., 3 Cir., 139 F.2d 871. The contentions of the defendant will be considered in the order in which they appear in the Motion.
Service of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Central Mexico Light & Power Co. v. MunchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Culver v. Bell & Loffland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Boro Hall Corporation v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brainard v. CanadaySuperior Court of Delaware · 1955
- Johnson v. ScarboroughDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1949
- Seely v. Illinois-California Express, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1982
- Coopersmith v. SteinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953