Legal Opinion

Manley, Bennett & Co. v. Woodhams

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1957No. Docket 37, Calendar 47,291PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In this case we must construe a declaration in assumpsit to determine whether it states a cause of action against the individuals named defendants. * The trial court decided that it did . not and dismissed the suit as to them after the-plaintiff had completed his opening statement. The plaintiff appeals.

The controversy, in brief, related to the payment of a commission upon the sale of the corporate defendant. The declaration in its pertinent portions is as follows:

' “5. On or about November 2, 1955, the plaintiff acting through its partner, the said John Ó. Mac-Par lane, was orally authorized…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michigan Aero Club v. ShelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Society of Good Neighbors v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Dodge v. BloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Doyle v. KammeraadMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Spelman v. AddisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Applebaum v. WechslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Stephenson v. StephensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Knickerbocker v. SamsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Scott v. ClevelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Baker v. GushwaMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API