Legal Opinion

Scott v. Cleveland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1960No. Docket 70, 71, Calendar 47,798, 48,152PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

This casé arose out of a rear-end collision between a taxicab in which plaintiff was riding as a passenger and a private automobile driven by Mrs. Cleveland and owned by Mr. Houze. Defendant Marr was the owner and defendant Sholz was the driver of the taxicab. The collision occurred in 1954. Suit was started by summons in 1956, and a declaration was filed following defendants’ appearances. The declaration was first amended in November of 1957. In December of 1957 a pretrial hearing was, held before the late Honorable Robert M. Toms, Wayne circuit judge, pursuant to the provisions of our Court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simonelli v. CassidyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Grant v. National Manufacturer & Plating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Kerr v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hormel Estate v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Konstantine v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Preston v. SleziakMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Dacon v. TransueMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Doan v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Fred Gibbs, Inc. v. Old Colony InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Shapiro v. Wendell Packing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API