Shaw v. Hill

This case has been here once before, and will be found reported in 79 Mich. 86. The facts are not materially different from what .they were then, except in the showing made by defendant as to her title to the premises.

There was also on the last trial some evidence tending to show that one Curran was in the actual occupancy of the premises at the time this suit was brought, and it is claimed by the defendant that he should have been made *324a defendant. It was shown, however, that the occupancy of Curran was for but a short time, and while he was working for defendant; that he made no claim to…