Legal Opinion

De Garmo v. Prater

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM SEQUATCHIE. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Sequatchie County. — T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The complainant filed his ejectment bill, claiming title and right to possession of 2,500 acres of land described therein. The defendant Rocky River Coal & Coke Company claims title and possession of 600 acres of the land described in the bill.

Complainant bases his right upon grant No. 3,375, issued by the State of Tennessee on July 29, 1834, to one Henderson Pope, from whom he deraigns title through a series of intermediate conveyances and descent cast. *501The defendant Rocky River Ooal & Coke Company claims under a grant issued to Abner Fletcher, No. 4,177, dated September 26, 1837.

There is an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tindal v. WesleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Davis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Chatard v. O'DonovanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Chiniquy v. Catholic Bishop of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Bowman v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spencer-Sturla Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Dearing v. Brush Creek Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Daniel v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API