Legal Opinion

Cottrell v. Moran

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1904No. Docket No. 93PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Macomb; Tappan, ,J., presiding. Summary proceedings by William Cottrell against Gilbert J. Moran for the possession of certain real estate. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant in a summary proceedings case has appealed from a verdict and judgment of restitution. The circuit judge directed a verdict for the complainant. To comprehend the case, allusion should be made to the state of the title.

*411The defendant, Gilbert J. Moran, was owner of the premises (a farm) on November 19, 1884, and on that day he gave a note and mortgage to the complainant for $3,500, due in two years, with interest at 7£ per cent. April 8, 1889, Moran executed and delivered to complainant a warranty deed, the consideration of which was $4,363.84, being the amount due at that date…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Moran v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Paldi v. PaldiMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Harrett v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Geiges v. GreinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People's Mortgage Corp. v. WiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kent v. TallentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Cohen v. Outlet Market Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API