Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. LINDA RAY GARDNER, —

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 23, 2005No. 03-3964PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOKEN, Chief Judge.

A jury convicted Linda Ray Gardner of conspiring to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The district court granted Gardner’s motion for a new trial, concluding that the prosecutor made an inadvertent but nonetheless improper comment on Gardner’s Fifth Amendment right not to testify by stating, during rebuttal closing argument, that “there is no evidence that refutes” incriminating testimony by a government witness. The government appeals. We have jurisdiction to review an order granting a new trial in a criminal case. See 18…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Noura JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. United States v. SandstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. State v. GibbsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API