Legal Opinion

United States v. Sandstrom

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 29, 2010No. 08-3161, 08-3164PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

A jury found Steven Sandstrom and Gary Eye (collectively, “defendants”) guilty for their roles in the shooting death of William McCay, an African-American male. Sandstrom and Eye targeted McCay because of his race while he walked on a public street. Defendants were charged with (1) interfering with federally-protected activities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(2)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (“Count 1”); (2) using a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence as set forth in Count 1, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(iii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (“Count 2”); (3)…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Noura JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. United States v. Elain YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. RentzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Manila VichitvongsaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Thomas CuretonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API