Legal Opinion

Lake v. Baccus

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1939No. 27170PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

The defendants filed a general demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition on the following grounds: “That the plaintiff’s petition as amended sets forth no cause of action. That plaintiff’s petition as amended is a declaration counting upon fraud which does not allege such facts as would in law amount to a fraud upon the part of these defendants. That plaintiff’s petition, as amended, is too indefinite, too uncertain and too vague to obtain any recovery whatsoever.” In their brief the defendants emphasized the argument that the plaintiff’s petition does not allege that the doctors “promised to cure…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Fuller v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Hedin v. Minneapolis Medical & Surgical InstituteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Frankel v. WolperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  5. Barker v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Howell v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Gabriel v. Town of NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Bulloch County Hospital Authority v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Washington v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. The Merchants National Bank v. Bernice I. MorrissCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API