Legal Opinion
Ford v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 26, 2011No. 11-96CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Judge:
Plaintiff is the lawful possessor of an un-patented mining claim on federal land located in southwest Oregon. Plaintiff, acting pro se, filed a complaint seeking to prevent the Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) from removing a cabin from that land. Plaintiff alleges the BLM’s destruction of the cabin would constitute an unlawful and compensable taking. Plaintiff seeks a writ of mandamus and an order enjoining the BLM from removing the cabin.
The Government filed a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of Court of Federal Claims…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Halim v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Freeman v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Vane Minerals (Us), LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Freeman v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015