Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Clifton v. Reeser

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1975No. 47347PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice.

Defendant Reeser is an optical dispenser (optician) in Shawnee, Oklahoma. Plaintiff, acting on the information of an optometrist, filed suit in the district court seeking an injunction against Reeser prohibiting him from making examinations of the human eye, duplicating lenses contact or otherwise without a written prescription, fitting, adapting or adjusting contact lenses without a prescription specifically written for contact lenses by an ophthalmologist or optometrist and from practicing optometry in any manner. Plaintiff also sought an order requiring defendant to dispose…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Wenke v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People Ex Rel. Watson v. House of VisionIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. STATE Ex Rel REED v. KUZIRIANOregon Supreme Court · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. BD. OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. SpitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. State Board for Property & Casualty RatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Samson Resources Co. v. SemCrude, L.P. (In re SemCrude, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  4. Davidson Oil Country Supply Co. v. Pioneer Oil & Gas Eqpt. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Lowery v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API